Current:Home > ScamsBiden administration coerced social media giants into possible free speech violations: court-LoTradeCoin
Biden administration coerced social media giants into possible free speech violations: court
View Date:2024-12-23 23:22:53
The White House, health officials and the FBI may have violated the First Amendment rights of people posting about COVID-19 and elections on social media by pressuring technology companies to suppress or remove the posts, a federal appeals court ruled late Friday.
The decision from the conservative 5th Circuit Court of Appeals partly upheld an order from a Louisiana federal judge that blocked many federal agencies from having contact with companies like Facebook, YouTube and X, formerly Twitter, about content moderation.
But the 75-page opinion from three-judge panel also significantly narrowed the scope of the order that was a major victory for conservatives.
The Biden administration has 10 days to seek a Supreme Court review of the ruling.
“DOJ is reviewing the court’s decision and will evaluate its options in this case," the White House said in a statement. "This administration has promoted responsible actions to protect public health, safety, and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic and foreign attacks on our elections. Our consistent view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take account of the effects their platforms are having on the American people, but make independent choices about the information they present.”
The states of Louisiana and Missouri filed the lawsuit along with a conservative website owner and four people who opposed the administration’s COVID-19 policy.
The lawsuit accused administration officials of coercing platforms into taking down controversial content including election fraud, the FBI's handling of Hunter Biden's laptop and the COVID pandemic.
The 5th Circuit panel found that the White House coerced the platforms through “intimidating messages and threats of adverse consequences” and commandeered the decision-making processes of social media companies, particularly in handling pandemic-related and 2020 election posts.
“It is true that the officials have an interest in engaging with social media companies, including on issues such as misinformation and election interference. But the government is not permitted to advance these interests to the extent that it engages in viewpoint suppression,” the judges wrote.
The appeals court pared down U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty’s July 4 ruling, saying it was "overbroad." Doughty said the lawsuit may involve "the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history."
It also removed also some agencies from the order: the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency and the State Department. Many of those government officials, the judges ruled, were “permissibly exercising government speech.”
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry called Friday’s ruling a major win against censorship.
"This is a significant victory for the American people,” Landry said in a statement to USA TODAY. “And it confirms what we have said from the very beginning: the federal government is not permitted to engage in viewpoint suppression, no matter your political ideology.”
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey posted on X: "The Fifth Circuit has upheld the district court’s order in our free speech case, Missouri v. Biden, enjoining the White House, Surgeon General, CDC, & FBI from violating the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans."
veryGood! (914)
Related
- Reds honor Pete Rose with a 14-hour visitation at Great American Ball Park
- Chicken wings advertised as ‘boneless’ can have bones, Ohio Supreme Court decides
- Kamala Harris: A Baptist with a Jewish husband and a faith that traces back to MLK and Gandhi
- Transit and environmental advocates sue NY governor over decision to halt Manhattan congestion toll
- It's about to be Red Cup Day at Starbucks. When is it and how to get the free coffee swag?
- Does Taylor Swift support Kamala Harris? A look at her political history, new Easter eggs
- Wife who pled guilty to killing UConn professor found dead hours before sentencing: Police
- Brooke Shields' Twinning Moment With Daughter Grier Deserves Endless Love
- 'Survivor' 47, Episode 9: Jeff Probst gave players another shocking twist. Who went home?
- Whistleblower tied to Charlotte Dujardin video 'wants to save dressage'
Ranking
- 'SNL' stars jokingly declare support for Trump, Dana Carvey plays Elon Musk
- Unleash Your Inner Merc with a Mouth: Ultimate Deadpool Fan Gift Guide for 2024– Maximum Chaos & Coolness
- What's next for 3-time AL MVP Mike Trout after latest injury setback?
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Let Me Spell It Out
- Tropical Storm Sara threatens to bring flash floods and mudslides to Central America
- Yellowstone shuts down Biscuit Basin for summer after hydrothermal explosion damaged boardwalk
- Nashville grapples with lingering neo-Nazi presence in tourist-friendly city
- Steph Curry talks Kamala Harris' US presidential campaign: 'It's a big deal'
Recommendation
-
Olivia Munn Randomly Drug Tests John Mulaney After Mini-Intervention
-
Taylor Swift's best friend since childhood Abigail is 'having his baby'
-
Blake Lively Crashes Ryan Reynolds’ Interview in the Most Hilarious Way
-
Brittany Aldean Slams Maren Morris’ “Pro-Woman Bulls--t” Stance Amid Feud
-
Fire crews on both US coasts battle wildfires, 1 dead; Veterans Day ceremony postponed
-
A woman is killed and a man is injured when their upstate New York house explodes
-
In Northeast Ohio, Hello to Solar and Storage; Goodbye to Coal
-
3 arrested in death of Alexa Stakely, Ohio mom killed trying to save son in carjacking